Subscribe
About Shared Purpose
Shared Purpose is a forum to think about, discuss, and predict what’s next for business and society.
Follow us on Twitter @apcoworldwide
Contributors
Leela StakeLeela is a director who helps businesses innovate, collaborate and communicate to be more successful. She’s based in San Francisco, has worked in six Asian countries and is interested in the relationship between long-term business success and community prosperity.
Laura PalantoneLaura is a member of our corporate communications team and is based in New York.
James RobinsonJames is a director who brings ten years of experience working on CR strategy and communications in New York, Beijing, and Jakarta. He looks at how CR is employed as part of broader business strategy and has a particular interest in the evolving role of technology and innovation in managing social and environmental issues.
Julie JackA director in APCO's New York office, Julie works on corporate responsibility with a focus on business strategy and emerging issues and trends. Her currents interests and work focus on sustainable agriculture and supply chain management, the integration of CR and financial communications, and CR in the consumer goods space.
Ellen MignoniEllen is a senior director and helped build APCO’s global corporate responsibility practice. She works primarily with APCO’s corporate clients on business alignment and corporate responsibility, stakeholder engagement and partnership development, and communication and outreach.APCOForum.com
Visit APCOForum.com, the home blog of APCO Worldwide. Contributors include APCO's consultants around the world.
HealthScope
Visit HealthScope, our new blog discussing the issues facing health today.
History & Categories
Click to unfold.Recent Posts
- What’s behind the gender wage gap in Seattle?
- iCrisis, version 2.0
- Takeaways From New Renewable Energy Proposals in Washington State
- The Red Equal Signs: Top Takeaways for Cause-Conscious Companies
- Women Helping Women
- Meet the Aspirationals: Three Findings from Regeneration Roadmap
- As Same-Sex Marriage Reaches the Supreme Court, So Does Support from Corporate America
- Shareholders of the World, Unite!? (Part II)
- Mandatorily Philanthropic?
- The Word from Seattle: U.S. Needs Sustained Clean Tech Movement
Categories
- Business Alignment/Integration (69)
- Philanthropy (65)
- Volunteerism & Service (56)
- Community Engagement (50)
- What's Next for CR (50)
- Communicating CR (48)
- Nonprofit Operations and Communications (35)
- CR in North America (33)
- Cause Marketing (23)
- Health (23)
Archives by Month
- May 2013 (2)
- April 2013 (1)
- March 2013 (3)
- February 2013 (5)
- January 2013 (5)
- December 2012 (2)
- October 2012 (11)
- September 2012 (5)
- August 2012 (9)
- July 2012 (1)
Blogroll
- Alice Korngold on Fast Company
- Armchair Advocates
- Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship’s In Good Company
- Case Foundation Blog
- CECP Blog
- Chronicle of Philanthropy’s Give and Take
- CSRwire Talkback
- Ethical Corporation's Reflection on Ethical Business
- Hands On Network Blog
- Marc Gunther's Blog
- Points of Light Institute’s Blog
- Taproot Foundation's Pro Bono Junkie's Blog
- U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Business Civic Leadership Center Blog

UK Government Cracks Down on… Philanthropy?
The UK government’s mantra, in these times of high unemployment, inflation and low growth, is “We’re all In this together.” And as public-sector spending cuts begin to bite, the government has been keen to show that they expect the very wealthy to do their part.
Hence last month’s Budget included, alongside a modest reduction in the top rate of personal income tax, an emphasis on tightening tax loopholes available to wealthy people, particularly in relation to stamp duty on very expensive residential properties. It also included a new ceiling on tax relief for the wealthy: from next year, tax relief above £50,000 in any one year will be capped at 25 percent of income in that year. This would limit, say, a person earning $10 million from claiming tax reliefs of more than £2.5 million; or a person earning £500,000 from claiming tax reliefs of more than £125,000. At first glance, at least to those 99 percent of Britons who earn much less (the UK’s median income is £25,000 a year), this seemed to provide still generous room for tax relief to high-income earners.
However, in the past few weeks, a major campaign against the tax relief changes for the rich has come from a surprising quarter: the UK’s non-profit sector. Leaders of the nation’s arts institutions, major health and children’s charities and umbrella bodies for the charitable sector have called on the government to exclude charitable donations from the ceiling or bear responsibility for a dramatic fall in large-scale private philanthropy. They have also pointed out that this outcome would sit very uneasily with the prime minister’s “Big Society” vision which promotes volunteerism and philanthropy. The tax relief ceiling, they say, is already leading wealthy donors to rethink and reduce planned major philanthropic gifts, thus undermining sustainable financing for many charities.
As members of his Conservative Party and coalition government joined the outcry, the prime minister has now signalled a possible rethink, through a “formal consultation” with charities and philanthropists. Following upon other political rows over various taxes in the Budget, and with Britain’s economy apparently entering a double-dip recession, “cracking down on philanthropy” is one more negative headline the prime minister could do without. There is considerable anger in some quarters at the government’s clumsy equation of wealthy philanthropists and tax avoidance. At the same time, there is unease that major philanthropic donations and the charities receiving them could be at such grave risk from even marginal changes in tax relief rules for the wealthy. The subliminal message of the charity sector’s campaign is that if tax relief for the wealthy is squeezed, philanthropy would be the first item on which wealthy people would cut back. And so far, few wealthy donors have spoken out on the issue. Maybe that’s why something seems lost in this debate – the joy of giving for its own sake perhaps, rather than as simply an accounting exercise.
Catogories CR in Europe, Philanthropy and tagged Big society, David Cameron, philanthropy, recession
. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.