Subscribe
About Shared Purpose
Shared Purpose is a forum to think about, discuss, and predict what’s next for business and society.
Follow us on Twitter @apcoworldwide
Contributors
Leela StakeLeela is a director who helps businesses innovate, collaborate and communicate to be more successful. She’s based in San Francisco, has worked in six Asian countries and is interested in the relationship between long-term business success and community prosperity.
Laura PalantoneLaura is a member of our corporate communications team and is based in New York.
James RobinsonJames is a director who brings ten years of experience working on CR strategy and communications in New York, Beijing, and Jakarta. He looks at how CR is employed as part of broader business strategy and has a particular interest in the evolving role of technology and innovation in managing social and environmental issues.
Julie JackA director in APCO's New York office, Julie works on corporate responsibility with a focus on business strategy and emerging issues and trends. Her currents interests and work focus on sustainable agriculture and supply chain management, the integration of CR and financial communications, and CR in the consumer goods space.
Ellen MignoniEllen is a senior director and helped build APCO’s global corporate responsibility practice. She works primarily with APCO’s corporate clients on business alignment and corporate responsibility, stakeholder engagement and partnership development, and communication and outreach.APCOForum.com
Visit APCOForum.com, the home blog of APCO Worldwide. Contributors include APCO's consultants around the world.
HealthScope
Visit HealthScope, our new blog discussing the issues facing health today.
History & Categories
Click to unfold.Recent Posts
- What’s behind the gender wage gap in Seattle?
- iCrisis, version 2.0
- Takeaways From New Renewable Energy Proposals in Washington State
- The Red Equal Signs: Top Takeaways for Cause-Conscious Companies
- Women Helping Women
- Meet the Aspirationals: Three Findings from Regeneration Roadmap
- As Same-Sex Marriage Reaches the Supreme Court, So Does Support from Corporate America
- Shareholders of the World, Unite!? (Part II)
- Mandatorily Philanthropic?
- The Word from Seattle: U.S. Needs Sustained Clean Tech Movement
Categories
- Business Alignment/Integration (69)
- Philanthropy (65)
- Volunteerism & Service (56)
- Community Engagement (50)
- What's Next for CR (50)
- Communicating CR (48)
- Nonprofit Operations and Communications (35)
- CR in North America (33)
- Cause Marketing (23)
- Health (23)
Archives by Month
- May 2013 (2)
- April 2013 (1)
- March 2013 (3)
- February 2013 (5)
- January 2013 (5)
- December 2012 (2)
- October 2012 (11)
- September 2012 (5)
- August 2012 (9)
- July 2012 (1)
Blogroll
- Alice Korngold on Fast Company
- Armchair Advocates
- Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship’s In Good Company
- Case Foundation Blog
- CECP Blog
- Chronicle of Philanthropy’s Give and Take
- CSRwire Talkback
- Ethical Corporation's Reflection on Ethical Business
- Hands On Network Blog
- Marc Gunther's Blog
- Points of Light Institute’s Blog
- Taproot Foundation's Pro Bono Junkie's Blog
- U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Business Civic Leadership Center Blog

Super Bowl Ads That Got it Right: Aligning With Their Inner Champion Brand
On the day after the Super Bowl, most of the talk and reporting centered not on the thrilling game or 31-minute blackout delay or Beyoncé’s performance (OK, there was quite a bit of coverage of her), but on the commercials: the perennial quest by advertisers to one-up each other and win the coveted USA Today Ad Meter. Like many in the communications profession, I anxiously awaited the start of the ad parade, er game, and have my own thoughts on the ads. Some were entertaining, others endearing, and still others perplexing. At least one pushed the boundaries of good taste and was roundly criticized by professionals and consumers alike.
However, three ads stood above the others for me. Like many other viewers and critics, I, too, enjoyed and appreciated Anheuser-Busch InBev’s “Budweiser Brotherhood” aka “Clydesdale,” Ram Truck’s “Farmer,” and Jeep’s “Whole Again.” Yes, each ad pulled at one’s heartstrings and played to emotion. Yes, each told a story and was long form (1 minute for Bud and 2 minutes each for Ram and Jeep). Each used compelling images, two incorporated music which drove the story forward and two featured iconic and gripping narrators. For me, the emotion in the ads rang true and seemed from the heart because each ad tapped into multiple dimensions (Alignment, Authenticity, Attachment and Advocacy) identified in our Champion Brand Model, which we refer to as the Four A’s:
The Clydesdale ad worked for Budweiser because it tapped into its Champion Brand DNA, where we discovered consumers relate to Anheuser-Busch in terms of alignment, authenticity, and attachment. The Clydesdale horses are well-established symbols of Budweiser, and many Americans have never seen a Clydesdale that is not part of the Budweiser team. Many Americans have an affinity for “The King of Beers” and its American heritage, particularly out in the heartland. Yet, Budweiser falls short, as does it parent company, in terms of advocacy. Sure, the horse is majestic and the story is touching, but there could be more; the company could use its leadership position and ability to speak to its stakeholders to add value to society. It’s one of the reasons it’s not a Champion Brand.
The ads from Chrysler brands Ram and Jeep came into the ad bowl with high expectations, following on the success of the 2011 Eminem “Imported from Detroit” Chrysler 200 spot and 2012 Clint Eastwood “It’s Halftime in America” ad, both paying homage to Chrysler’s hometown of Detroit, the hard times the city (and country in 2012) had endured, and how those challenges had enabled each to emerge even stronger, much like Chrysler itself. This year’s offerings took a different tact: saluting the heritage of the brands and driving to advocate on behalf of its consumers. These two ads clearly tapped into the two strongest dimensions of Chrysler’s brand: authenticity and advocacy.
Chrysler isn’t a Champion Brand because for too long its cars didn’t meet our needs and there has been a profound lack of an emotional connection or excitement around the brand. Perhaps these commercials can help strengthen attachment while operations deal with alignment.
It may sound simple, but a company that knows itself and its stakeholders can do good. The Chrysler spots are testaments to that put into action, this time in the form of an advertisement.
I welcome your thoughts on which other ads may have tapped into the 4As.
Catogories Business Alignment/Integration and tagged AdBowl, Brand Bowl, Champion Brand, Clydesdale, Farmer, InBev, Jeep, RAM, Super Bowl ads, Whole Again
. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.