Subscribe
About Shared Purpose
Shared Purpose is a forum to think about, discuss, and predict what’s next for business and society.
Follow us on Twitter @apcoworldwide
Contributors
Leela StakeLeela is a director who helps businesses innovate, collaborate and communicate to be more successful. She’s based in San Francisco, has worked in six Asian countries and is interested in the relationship between long-term business success and community prosperity.
Laura PalantoneLaura is a member of our corporate communications team and is based in New York.
James RobinsonJames is a director who brings ten years of experience working on CR strategy and communications in New York, Beijing, and Jakarta. He looks at how CR is employed as part of broader business strategy and has a particular interest in the evolving role of technology and innovation in managing social and environmental issues.
Julie JackA director in APCO's New York office, Julie works on corporate responsibility with a focus on business strategy and emerging issues and trends. Her currents interests and work focus on sustainable agriculture and supply chain management, the integration of CR and financial communications, and CR in the consumer goods space.
Ellen MignoniEllen is a senior director and helped build APCO’s global corporate responsibility practice. She works primarily with APCO’s corporate clients on business alignment and corporate responsibility, stakeholder engagement and partnership development, and communication and outreach.APCOForum.com
Visit APCOForum.com, the home blog of APCO Worldwide. Contributors include APCO's consultants around the world.
HealthScope
Visit HealthScope, our new blog discussing the issues facing health today.
History & Categories
Click to unfold.Recent Posts
- What’s behind the gender wage gap in Seattle?
- iCrisis, version 2.0
- Takeaways From New Renewable Energy Proposals in Washington State
- The Red Equal Signs: Top Takeaways for Cause-Conscious Companies
- Women Helping Women
- Meet the Aspirationals: Three Findings from Regeneration Roadmap
- As Same-Sex Marriage Reaches the Supreme Court, So Does Support from Corporate America
- Shareholders of the World, Unite!? (Part II)
- Mandatorily Philanthropic?
- The Word from Seattle: U.S. Needs Sustained Clean Tech Movement
Categories
- Business Alignment/Integration (69)
- Philanthropy (65)
- Volunteerism & Service (56)
- Community Engagement (50)
- What's Next for CR (50)
- Communicating CR (48)
- Nonprofit Operations and Communications (35)
- CR in North America (33)
- Cause Marketing (23)
- Health (23)
Archives by Month
- May 2013 (2)
- April 2013 (1)
- March 2013 (3)
- February 2013 (5)
- January 2013 (5)
- December 2012 (2)
- October 2012 (11)
- September 2012 (5)
- August 2012 (9)
- July 2012 (1)
Blogroll
- Alice Korngold on Fast Company
- Armchair Advocates
- Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship’s In Good Company
- Case Foundation Blog
- CECP Blog
- Chronicle of Philanthropy’s Give and Take
- CSRwire Talkback
- Ethical Corporation's Reflection on Ethical Business
- Hands On Network Blog
- Marc Gunther's Blog
- Points of Light Institute’s Blog
- Taproot Foundation's Pro Bono Junkie's Blog
- U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Business Civic Leadership Center Blog

LIVESTRONG post-Lance
Tara Greco is senior director in APCO Worldwide’s corporate responsibility practice.
I’ve posted several times about the impact Lance Armstrong’s steroid use would/could/should have on the foundation he started, LIVESTRONG. I’ve been following the series of announcements over the last 48 hours—Nike and Radio Shack discontinuing sponsorships of Lance, Anheuser-Busch stating it will not renew at the end of its 2012 contract and Lance himself stepping down as the Chair of the LIVESTRONG board of directors.
As a communications professional, I agree that Lance did the right and responsible thing for the organization. His personal drama was causing a distraction for LIVESTRONG and taking important attention and resources away from mission-focused work. He is giving the Foundation space to distance itself from the doping conversation and helping protect it from future damage. Reputationally, I still do not believe that the Foundation will take a big hit. They are preparing to celebrate a 15th anniversary and in that time have proven to be a valuable resource and advocate for cancer patients and their families. They are substantive, well-managed and have a well-known and well-respected brand that does not rely on Lance.
The foundation’s financial health, however, may take a hit from Lance’s personal and professional decisions. About 30 percent of revenue for LIVESTRONG comes from cause-marketing and licensing (read: deals with Lance’s sponsors). Now that many of those relationships have been discontinued, LIVESTRONG needs to identify other streams of revenue. Hopefully the leadership has been considering how to diversify the funding pool and can take the necessary steps to shift funding sources with minimal disruption to the programs.
Personally, I’m rooting for LIVESTRONG. They, and Lance, have inspired me to stay tough and positive in my own battle with cancer and I know their support and message is invaluable to others (See: LIVESTRONG manifesto). TJ Quinn at ESPN has been covering the Lance/steroid story since it started. In one of his segments yesterday, Quinn said, “I can’t tell you how many people I know that wear those yellow wristbands…people wanted so badly to believe in this guy.” Count me in that camp. Still. Despite all of the information that has been uncovered about the steroids. And, one of TJ’s twitter followers (Tim Clough, @coopersam), so perfectly captured the reason why on Twitter: “blame me or not but [my] head is going in the sand. He inspired my mom to fight cancer. The rest means nothing.”
Catogories Nonprofit Operations and Communications and tagged Lance Armstrong, LIVESTRONG, reputation management
. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.